this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

1171 readers
3 users here now

There are a couple of community rules in addition to the main instance rules.

All posts must be about Apple

Anything goes as long as it’s about Apple. News about other companies and devices is allowed if it directly relates to Apple.

No NSFW content

While lemmy.zip allows NSFW content this community is intended to be a place for all to feel welcome. Any NSFW content will be removed and the user banned.

If you have any comments or suggestions please message one of the moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] misk@piefed.social -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It is malicious towards the guy who tried to dox person behind archive.today. By altering content you mean that archive.today is trolling that guy by deadnaming him. I’ll keep on using this site because it provides valuable service, unlike the guy that I’m inadvertently DDoSing. You’re defending an asshole just because he’s transgender.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Two wrongs don’t make a right, and you are liable for your computer being used to attack others.

[–] misk@piefed.social 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, police are coming for everyone with an infected router any time now.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not what I said.

It’s like littering. You’re responsible for your actions.

[–] misk@piefed.social 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I’m okay with ddosing someone’s blog because they wanted to dox someone providing great service. Sometimes you need to stand up for yourself and show you’re going to fight back.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So it is malicious, and it’s not an archive as it alters content. So what service is it providing then?

[–] misk@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I’ve just described entire extent of that content altering so you can stop pretending now it’s anything more than that. As to capability to alter content, that existed always.

That service is providing archived copies of websites, often paywalled, which is quite valuable given that free news aren’t worth much these days. Not that FT or Bloomberg don’t have agenda but their target is different and they’re still adhering to some journalistic standards.