this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
739 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

82414 readers
3522 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
739
I'm struggling to think of any online services for which I'd be willing to verify my identity or age (neilzone.co.uk)
submitted 5 days ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
126 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hacker News.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

problems with that:

  • how do you verify that it works the way they say it works
  • how do you make yourself heard when it doesn't

so far the only answer I am aware of for these questions is "you don't"

[–] Limerance@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Public key cryptography and signatures are common technologies nowadays.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

you won't be able to use that to verify the integrity of the system when the worry is that its creators are dishonest. you may be able to verify that something has happened (e.g. a successful attestation), but you won't be able to tell if the attestation was actually executed for your device and the app in question, or it was proxied to another device the devs run to fake attestations.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The additional problem with that is straight up discrimination. We're replacing a predatory system with another discriminatory system. It is essentially another path that leads to the same thing. Fighting fascism with fascism.

[–] dynamoMaus@feddit.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

how do you verify that it works the way they say it works

Open source -> you look at the code

how do you make yourself heard when it doesn't

In proper domcratic counties that is what law is for.

What I want to say with this: it is technically possible to make it proper. There is a interest not to do it properly.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

how do you verify that it works the way they say it works

Open source -> you look at the code

a source code repository on github does not have any guarantees that they are distributing the software built from exactly that source code.

but even worse, almost all such apps are closed source. and you have no chance to verify what runs on the server in either case.

how do you make yourself heard when it doesn't

In proper domcratic counties that is what law is for.

is this "law" thing you mentioned able to make your thoughts appear telepathically in the minds of millions of others, without a channel like the internet?

are you going to post to facebook with your discovery and hope millions will see it and agree with you?

or are you going to grab a big board and a megaphone and go to the town square about the problem?
this is probably the more effective way, but you'll be called obnoxious, especially by those who have no idea about the tech they use

[–] dynamoMaus@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

What I want to say with this: it is technically possible to make it proper.

There seems to be a interest not to do it properly.