this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)
news
761 readers
380 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why? What for? Nuclear weapons is the century-old technology. No need in talks or cooperation. Just throw a few million euros to a dozen engineers and they will do everything else.
Nuclear weapons are still an exteremely effective deterrent.
Diplomacy is great, but if you can't defend yourself, more powerful and aggressive nations will take advatage of you.
Europe used to be under the American nuclear umbrella until recently, but with Trumps antagonism we can no lonnger rely on that.
France is offering their nuclear arsenal to act as the nuclear umbrella in America's place.
Of course it is. I mean that in the XXI century any willing country can make its own nuclear weaponry. It isn't that hard technically. All problems are political.
Oh my bad, I completely misunderstood what you were saying. I read your comment as saying we should not be looking to obtain nuclear weapons because it's ancient tech, instead looking for diplomacy.
I do think that collaborating with France is a good first step towards quickly rebuilding the nuclear ubrella that was lost with the US falling away as an ally. It gives us time to breathe while we look at maybe building our own nuclear arsenals.