this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
645 points (96.1% liked)

Linux Gaming

24892 readers
746 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
monolalia@lemmy.world
645
Lutris maintainer: "I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not." (github.com)
submitted 4 days ago by bdonvr@thelemmy.club to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world
248 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Continued discussion: https://github.com/lutris/lutris/discussions/6530

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 147 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh yeah. Here's another nugget:

Sometimes, I generate some code with Claude and commit by hand

Sometimes, I write code manually and ask Claude to commit

Sometimes, I ask OpenClaw to generate some code, which doesn't put the Co-Authorship

Sometimes, the whole thing is AI generated from end to end

This is also a somewhat recent addition to Claude Code. I was kinda surprised when I first noticed it but didn't think much of it, I was like "meh, I guess we're doing that now, whatever, some people might take issue with it, whatever". Also, do keep in mind that I love trolling people coming in my projects to complain about my methods.

For those who are anti-AI, it's a safe assumption that any addition to the project has had some kind of AI interaction during the development process.

https://github.com/lutris/lutris/discussions/6530#discussioncomment-16088355

[–] mlfh@lemmy.sdf.org 171 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Sometimes, I ask OpenClaw to...

This person should not be trusted with anything.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That is the real shame in all this. I'm certainly not updating lutris any more, because there is no way of knowing what you will install on your system.

You can trust humans (as in "trusting is an option"). You can never trust an LLM. And admitting that there might be unsupervised commits, being installed on possibly thousands of PCs is terrifying.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Glad I use Heroic instead. Time to check what their AI policy is.

Based on some PRs, they're using github copilot to help with reviews but are generally against vibe coding

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago

💯 this. I don’t mind using an LLM for certain tasks. We all do at the end of the day. However, OpenClaw is a different topic. This is just dangerous.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago

So Trumps gonna give him the nuclear launch codes any minute now is what you are saying?