this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
80 points (97.6% liked)

Futurology

4129 readers
248 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There are nearly 9000 hours in a year. Performance after only 2000 isn't a useful metric. I know there are people who can give better numbers

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

They mention 100 k hours effective lifetime in the article. 11 years is good, if true.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 2 points 16 hours ago

It's an important proof of concept. If it can survive 2,000 hours in air, then it may be possible to tweak it so it survives 20,000 in air and 2,000 in rain. Then tweak it again and it survives 200,000 hours. Engineering is iterating on a design, not developing the final product out of the gate.