this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
207 points (98.6% liked)

News

36744 readers
2368 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mood among some in Iran shifts from hope of being rescued to dismay at destruction of infrastructure, culture and lives

After years of arrests, disappearances and mass killings of protesters, the hatred in Iran from some quarters for the hardline, oppressive governing regime had boiled into such a desperate rage that many believed Donald Trump’s promise that the US would “come to their rescue”.

Now, after a fortnight of war, with US and Israeli airstrikes killing hundreds as they hit residential blocks, shops, fuel depots and even a school, the mood is changing.

“They are also lying! Like the regime has been lying to us,” said Amir*, a student at the University of Tehran. “You are all worse than each other.”

The anti-regime protester has let himself hope for more from the US and Israel, which on the first day of the war had swiftly killed Iran’s most feared and powerful man, the supreme leader.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Immigrants who supported Trump "liberating" their home countries have a special place in stupid people Hell.

Let's also not pretend for even a moment that these stupid motherfuckers were ever planning on returning to their home countries, even if they were legitimately made free and democratic. They scream for war and liberation that they have zero real stake in, and would never themselves participate in.

Chicken-hawk pathetic stupid fucks through and through.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sheer amount of immigrants and POC who supported/support Trump is wild

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

In my personal experience, racial minorities who, at least, supported Trump in 2024, have the archetypical personality of a manipulative abuser.

They are arrogant, they are borderline or outright narcissistic, they look down upon everyone else around them, they are perpetually disruptive, they truly believe they're the smartest person in the room, and everyone else feels colossal relief when they leave.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Immigrants who supported Trump “liberating” their home countries

Single-issue voters who also like narcking illegals.

[–] Eggyhead@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This comment makes me sick.

I dislike Trump as much as the next guy, but for Iranians this is their home, their culture, their families. Of course they wanted to believe it would be liberated. Of course they bought into Trump’s lies because this is the closest chance at freedom they’ve had. What choice would they have? No don’t fight the authoritarian regime that displaced them?

Kindly go take your racist-ass victim blaming elsewhere.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

~~Bro, if they paid attention to literally anything trump has ever done they would have known better.~~

~~It would be like trusting trump to babysit your 12 year old daughter and being surprised when she's sold to a billionaire.~~

I misread the original comment and thought it was about Iranian Americans voting for Trump.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Orif they payed attention to the genocide in Gaza

[–] Eggyhead@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You aren’t wrong, but you can’t blame them for celebrating their regime being overthrown and supporting the Americans even under Trump. What’s the alternative, root for Iranian supreme leader?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~They were talking about Iranian Americans who voted for Trump, which I think is where the confusion is from.~~

Nvm, it was me who read it wrong. You're absolutely right.

[–] mellowistheyellow@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you want to defend people supporting colonialism and genocide? Make it make sense, thanks.

[–] Eggyhead@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I’m not saying any of this is justification for what Trump is doing, just that it’s understandable why people who fled their country might be excited to see change happen. So much so that they would willingly cheer him on. I had an Iranian friend flat out tell me the Americans could take most of the oil and it would still be a huge win for the Iranian people compared to what they have now. They want their freedom. They’re happy to see the guy who kills people getting killed, and I think there’s room to empathize there.

Does that make sense?