this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
201 points (98.1% liked)

World News

54727 readers
2634 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since Italy became a country in 1861, there has been a surefire way to know who is and isn’t an Italian citizen: look at their parents.

The first page of the civil code, published in 1865 as the rulebook to Europe’s newest country, declared that a child born to an Italian citizen was an Italian citizen.

This founding tenet of the Bel Paese now looks set to change — ending diaspora dreams of returning to the mother country, and meaning that Italians who move abroad risk denying citizenship to their descendants.

On Thursday the Constitutional Court said it would rule in favor of the government and its controversial 2025 law that restricted citizenship for those born abroad. The law — issued last March via emergency decree — had been challenged by four judges, who questioned its constitutionality.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Citizenship is a social contract that provides dues and benefits. If you dont live there, don’t do your dues, but remain entitled to your benefits, wouldn’t that just strain the resources available to citizens who actually are living there, doing their dues?

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The only real strain on the system is that they have to record where you are and send you official documents from time to time as well as providing a way to vote from abroad. In times of crisis they may organise emergency flights to get you out of danger.

Besides that, an Italian citizen living abroad is not a large expense for the government.

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If they remigrate back to Italy, they'd be entitled to education and healthcare, which are the largest Italian expenditures, without contributing to the system.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago

That is true if they go to Italy after retirement age or very sick. Otherwise they'll be working in Italy as well and be paying taxes in the country.

[–] NeilNuggetstrong@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

In Norway we have 5.5 million citizens. There are roughly 6 million American citizens of Norwegian descendants. If we had the same system that would put an unbelievable strain on our country