this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
165 points (97.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

8041 readers
1077 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Who's the only one who have invoked article 5?

Who?

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 51 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

The USA after the September 11 attacks on the WTC declared war on terror and invoked article 5 of the NATO treaty.

In the two following wars (Afghanistan and Iraq) and the resulting instable occupation of both, many servicemen from other NATO countries lost their lives in service to US wars.

It is also good to remember who created the Mujahideen, the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in the first place, because that's all the US.

And what of Iran? Well the US wanted Mohammad Mosaddegh (the secular and democratically elected leader of Iran) gone, because he wanted to nationalize the iranian oil. So the CIA staged a coup to put the Shah in place who let US and british oil companies into the country again, a totalitarian, dictatorial monarch who suppressed his own people so much, that they turned to the only power left that was able to rid them of his tyranical rule: The Mullahs.

All of this, every little bit, is COMPLETELY the US' fault and ALWAYS has the USA been unable to clean their own mess themselves alone.

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's important not to conflate the attack on Iraq with NATO. Not that many nations were dumb enough to follow Bush into that one

[–] mimavox@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Exactly, The Article 5 thing didn't fly, so they created a "coalition of the willing" instead. But that didn't have anything to do with NATO.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

While it is a dramatisation and takes creative liberties, I still wholeheartedly recommend Charlie Wilson’s War as a way to explain just how the US managed to fuck itself by abandoning the Mujahideen and the Afghan people (and not for the last time) post-Soviet defeat - directly leading to the creation of Al’Qaeda, and therefore the 9/11 attacks.

Plus it has Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts, so it’s an easy watch.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

Because if you can't win with rhetoric then killing is the next best option. Brought to you by fascists white washing murder into a wholesome movie.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

And every time the US shits the bed, NATO gets to smell it.