Free and Open Source Software

22050 readers

515 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

195

Do you consider the free software movement to be an anarchist/communist project? (infosec.pub)

submitted 18 hours ago by DeckPacker@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/foss@beehaw.org

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This thought came to me in the shower today. Open source checks most of the boxes. It is a collaborative, worker owned (develloper-owned) project, that tries to flatten hierarchy. Especially if you look at something like Debian ), which really tries to have a bottom-up structure.
Of course, there are exceptions, considering there are a lot of corporate open-source projects, that are not democratically maintained and clearly only serve the interest of the company, who created it (like chromium for example).
So I am mainly talking about community-oriented FOSS projects here.
And if you were to agree with my statement, would you say that developing FOSS software is advancing the goals of the anarchist / communist project, because it is laying the groundwork infrastructure needed for a new kind of economy and society?
Thought this could be an interesting discussion!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I do not.

FOSS is the natural conclusion of public code having a negligible cost to supply once it has been produced. Ideally it takes IP out of the equation and allocates compensation towards development rather than rent extraction.

FOSS is a question of centralization & authority vs decentralization & freedom.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

It's what happens when copyright gets extended to infinity with no useful public domain to speak of. And then they will force you to rent the shit out of the copyright with a monthly subscription.

Linux runs on billions of devices. Every device with a microprocessor, except for the tiny portion of desktops, would be useless hunks of garbage without Linux. And Linux would not have those numbers if it wasn't FOSS. The internet would be a shell of its current self without FOSS and Linux.

The world needs FOSS, and quite frankly, it's a direct counterbalance to the invasive force of capitalism. Anybody who think the GPL isn't political clearly hasn't read anything its creators wrote.