this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
121 points (98.4% liked)

Programming

26148 readers
297 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 41 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

For every HTML 2.0 you might have tried, you were just as likely to have got stuck in the dead-end of Flash.

This one hurt. I had a decade plus old piece of tech debt from when they fucking killed flash before I could move on to new projects.

[–] Redkey@programming.dev 12 points 10 hours ago

I sympathize with the point of the article, but if someone's seriously citing Flash, which had widespread success for a run of about 15 years before being overtaken by later developments (driven in part by a billionaire with an axe to grind), as a short-lived "dead end" that was best avoided, then how long do they think is a sensible amount of time to wait to see if something's worth spending time and effort? Nothing remains on top forever.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Flash had its use. I think a better analogy for me is web frameworks.

I remember in the mid 2000s there seems to be a new one every week. “LOL, you aren’t using Ruby On Rails? Peasant!” “LOL, you aren’t using Django? Peasant!”

Still seems to be the case with Electron, React, Node, blah blah blah.

Running to stand still.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

“LOL, you aren’t using Django? Peasant!”

... I'm working on learning Django to get a job... should I stop? What should I use instead?

My webserver I've had for a while supports basically that.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I’m the wrong person to ask. My goto language is older than I am and hasn’t had a meaningful change since I was born.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 8 points 10 hours ago

Django isn't going anywhere. The point is not to jump on the latest fad, which Django isn't.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I feel like the web framework question has stabilized in recent years. React and node (not a web framework but in a similar boat) are stable and common, and angular and a few others are good alternatives.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I hear they’re changing the language these things run on from JavaScript to TypeScript.

No thanks to the hamster wheel.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

TS is a superset of js though, you can still use normal js and probably won't have to even change the file extension or anything like literally 0 change

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, Typescript just compiles down to JavaScript. I'm also generally anti a million frameworks, but JavaScript to TypeScript is easy

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't it also like opt in? If you don't annotate a type it just defaults to Any, which is just unchecked like standard JS

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

As far as I know, it is. Type safety is optional but very useful sometimes