this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
126 points (97.0% liked)

Linux

12911 readers
799 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The latest changes implemented in the Systemd repo, related to or prompted by age-verification laws, have made many people unhappy (I suppose links about this aren't necessary). This has led to a surge in Systemd forks during the last days ("surge" because there have always been plenty of forks). Here are some forks that explicitly mention those changes as their reason for forking (rough time ordering taken from the fork page):

Hopefully the energy of this reaction won't be scattered among too many alternatives, although some amount of scattering is always good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This is a stupid reason to fork systemd, this is an optional features. I can think of totally reasonable use cases/situations where such an optional makes a lot of sense.

Mind you, while I don't have children, I have no intent to restrict their usage of the internet. Teaching them critical thinking and providing them a broad cultural exposure seems like a much more productive approach.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 46 minutes ago

I do think it would be better as a optional systemd add-on type of package, if such a thing exists.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Merging something so conflictive and blocking the revert make it look suspicious, more after knowing Meta have invested billions on gettinh age verification everywhere.

Systemd has now vibed code and reviews, in the most critical process on most Linux machines. I see red flags.