this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
246 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

82989 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 46 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

None of the id fields in the systemd db are required to be filled. This is useless. Simply don't put any personal info in, and bam, you're already liberated, from laws that aren't even in effect yet!

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Yupp 100% optional.

for now

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is perfectly logical and I agree. Except that this controversy has prompted me to go learn about Lennart Poettering. I've been using systemd forever and I like it - I like journald and remote journald, I like networkd, I even deleted cron off my systems and use systemd timers exclusively. I knew there was some controversy about Lennart, but I didn't really care. Now that I've read a bit about his background and, maybe more importantly, his new company - I don't have a good feeling for the future of systemd.

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

Finally someone who's read into the issue

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Will you still say that when they implement ID checking functionality?

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

when that happens, I'll build my own ISO with that part stripped out, or just move away from systemd

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously not, that would be something very very different than what they've done.

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What systemd has done is the following: They went "we speak for the distros utilizing our program now"

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

What they've done, is in the user info field (which already has a ton of information that almost nobody ever fills out) they added a date of birth field. They do not control what it's used for, who's going to use it, or if the user will ever bother filling it out. Perhaps nobody will ever implement a use for it, it's really nothing.

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No, what they have done is kowtowing.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

What? It's like saying systemd is handing the government your info because they have a field for your real name and address.

YOU control what info goes there, if any. It mandates NOTHING.

You may as well be mad at vim because your text editor is capable of storing your birthdate if you go in and type it and save it to /public/myInfo.txt

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

Context matters. Systemd did this as a reaction to frankly insane laws. They didn't have to do anything like this, yet they did and comparing this to changing and creating files manually in vim misses the point entirely. Intentionally doing something is very different from a feature being natively present.

YOU control what info goes there, if any. It mandates NOTHING.

Until closed source or even open source programs demand an ID verified age from the OS. When that happens you are forced to unmask yourself and the systemd shit is the first step to making such an API possible. It normalizes genuinely insane demands that add nothing for the users except compliance.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Will you still say that when aliens from the 19th Dimension verify your age rectally?

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know what this derailment is ultimately trying to say honestly.

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's saying that you can invent an infinite number of hypothetical futures but they are not useful for making decisions in the here and now

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

The prospect of being prompted to submit an ID is not useful for making decisions in the here and now? As far as I understand it, this is the concrete danger. California lawmakers and lawmakers from elsewhere have indicated that this is only the beginning.

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

But this is just speculation. The fact is, systemd introduced a new optional field in the local database. They don't publish an OS so they have no obligation to do anything more, actual implementation would have to happen in other projects.

What this is, is a spite-fork by some random AI researcher and anybody installing that on their system has way larger problems here and now than hypothetical ID verification in the maybe future.

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

They don’t publish an OS so they have no obligation to do anything more, actual implementation would have to happen in other projects

Why are the people who decide on changes to systemd implementing stuff that the vast majority of Linux users vehemently reject? +Things that they have no legal obligation of adding I might add.

What this is, is a spite-fork

No one deeply cares about the spite fork. It's weird that commentators have suddenly become very acclimatised to the systemd changes. A few days ago people were asking themselves why a rando got through with an intensely disliked pull request and now we are here.