this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
27 points (88.6% liked)

Programming

26277 readers
165 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When people say “taste,” what they actually mean is experience. Pattern recognition built up over years of doing the work. But calling it “taste” instead of “experience” does something subtle and harmful: it makes a learnable skill sound like a gift.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah it's clearly more than just experience. It's at least experience + actually learning + actually caring. I wouldn't rule out natural talent either, though I have seen plenty of smart people with poor programming taste.

For example I worked on a C++ SDK where the guy that wrote it was clearly very smart... But he had also written an enormous god object using CRTP to inherit about 20 classes. The aim was to make it somehow modular, but it absolutely wasn't. Clearly poor taste.

Maybe it's like religion. There are plenty of very smart people that believe in an imaginary friend. It's almost orthogonal to "smartness". Maybe taste is the same.