this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
613 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

84069 readers
2628 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null@lemmy.org 78 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

U.S. still depends on China, despite years of onshoring efforts.

Reminds me of that time when one president signed a bill to move chip production to the US then the next president raided the chip-making facility and arrested all those chip-making people for trying to show the locals how to make chips.

[–] percent 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would you mind elaborating a little more? I live under a rock but this seems interesting

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

The Hyundai engineers, technicians, and equipment installers were not teaching anyone how to make chips.

[–] percent 11 points 3 weeks ago
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

one president signed a bill to move chip production to the US then the next president raided the chip-making facility and arrested all those chip-making people for trying to show the locals how to make chips

Chip making production has begun to migrate largely as a consequence of the Trump tariffs. The Biden plan to send Intel a few billion in kickbacks in exchange for a chip fab industry that wasn't the laughing stock of the planet only enriched shareholders and executives.

I'm not sure what you're referring to. Maybe Operation Low Voltage, which was a raid on a Hyundai battery plant in Georgia? I can't find anything about a raid on a chip fab plant.

In fairness to Trump leadership, a bunch of these workers were, in fact, overstayed on their visas. Although, as usual, Trump sent guys in with shotguns to do what a sternly worded letter would have just as easily accomplished.

But these are the two faces of Western Capital. The bailout and the beat down. Liberals throw money at the problem. Conservatives slap you around on the thinnest pretexts. Neither president seems to have benefited the US domestic consumer.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

More so both are factors towards onshoring happening. Same with PVs and batteries. Though Trump's other policy undermind a lot of that progress as well.

The CHIPs act also favored union work and even funneled some money to worker owned shops. That so far seemed to be toothless in keeping this admin aligned there

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The CHIPs act also favored union work and even funneled some money to worker owned shops.

It overwhelmingly favored Intel, for better or worse. And the early influx of cash did nothing to prevent Intel from axing 15,000 jobs.

I'm not here to praise Trump for any of his trade policies. But what Biden pitched through the CHIPs Act was largely a bailout for under-performing domestic producers more focused on dividends than scaled production or R&D. He'd have been better off nationalizing Intel than just handing them bricks of cash in the form of grants and low-interest loans. That is (kinda) what Trump ended up doing when he ordered the Treasury to take a 10% stake in the firm.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly. I agree. A big issue the US has with "industrial policy" type of deals in general is this. Big businesses can afford to have specialists to get access to programs and programs can "accomplish" their budgets goals faster with these bigger deals. The COVID small business loans had the same issue.

Also supply side money funnels are popular with donors/lobbyists (for obvious reasons) but are almost always garbage. Demand side (upfront funding for some needed thing, and payments for fulfillment) are still possible for to fuck up but do WAY better.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

That was the biggest failure so far. The other ones seem to be smaller

[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

An absolute disgrace