this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
930 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

83632 readers
3896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 32 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

There are plenty of mainstream platforms to reach such people on that aren't owned by (openly) Nazi billionaires.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 63 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Hence why this article is about them leaving the openly Nazi billionaire's platform while remaining on other platforms that are mainstream and still provide a lot of reach :)

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 36 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Yah, it's the EFF, they get significant latitude from their history.

[–] miked@piefed.social 11 points 8 hours ago

As they should.

A non-profit that fights daily for our electronic freedoms can leave X whenever they damn well please. They decided today was that day and I am perfectly fine with that.

EFF is one of the orgs I often donate to.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

And the argument is sound even without appeal to authority. You’re so right!

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Exactly, and these platforms are only mainstream now, many of them had much smaller userbases before the X takeover of Twitter.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There's nothing wrong with preaching to Nazis. Sure, most aren't likely to really listen, but they are the people who need to hear this most.

You don't write people off because they're wrong, you correct them.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

More over, most of the people there are lurkers. Our comments should be directed to them.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 10 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Name one single mainstream (i.e. >10 million users) platform that isn't owned by a nazi pedophile billionaire.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, that's why I included the word 'openly' in there.

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

X is owned by a wannabe pedophile from what the Epstein files showed, so maybe X is the only one?

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Zuckerberg and Gates own the only other mainstream social media sites. While the fediverse is neat, the entirety of all federated services, including the pretty failed launch of bluesky, is less than the userbase of just facebook, in just the Philippines.

And both of them are pedophiles, and while I don't know if Gates is a nazi, Zuckerberg absolutely is.

Also reddit, I guess, u/spez is a nazi, and reddit had the longest running clearweb jailbait site in world history so...

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I see, you think musk is only a wannabe pedophile. Grok says otherwise.

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Eh he is a big failure, and failed up his whole life just like DJT. They managed to fail at being human beings with empathy, but musk is so awkward he failed to get an invite to the oedo parties.