World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
You probably don't mean to, but you're sounding like a bit of an ignorant asshole. Were you like hangry or sth when you wrote this?
Possibly. I am in the process of decreasing my carb intake by 99%
Great that they closed their airspace. Truly. But praising them for "going hard" I think is silly. And I stand by that their reason for doing so is purely for domestic politics. It's the right decision but for the wrong reason.
I don't see why this matters to you at all. If someone feeds the homeless nefariously, then let them. The homeless are getting fed. If someone stops the holocaust because it allows them to cement their hegemony, or because they got paid for it, whatever! If it stops the holocaust, I'm happy.
Except it doesn't stop the genocide at all.
And the problem with doing the right thing for the wrong reason is that next time it's not going to be the right thing.
And people do feed homeless people nefariously, it's a real problem for real people. Mixing in moulded food. Filling sandwiches with toothpaste.
I'm sure you want them to say thank you and eat around the toothpaste... but I'm not going to praise them for it.
You misunderstand the premise. Spain isn't mixing toothpaste in proverbial sandwiches here. They closed their air space for air traffic intended for the illegal assault on Iran. That's a good thing. It's a tuna melt sandwich, no tooth paste, in the hands of the homeless.
Yeah I know. I just thought it was a really stupid analogy
Ah, so you didn't miss the core point. So could you maybe try to address it?
I did.
Nice, that does address the core point. Two problems.
First, the idea that "next time it's not going to be the right thing" has not been established at all. I mean, clearly it's possible to do the right thing for the wrong reasons at least once, so it is not at all unimaginable that it could happen twice, three times, or as many times in a row as you'd like.
Secondly, you have given no indication what these "wrong reasons" are, in the case of Spain restricting its air space to impede the illegal assault on Iran. Is it to appease voters who are against this? Because that's literally just how democracy works.
So this is unrelated to the core point, but let's talk about it anyway. This reduces the avenues America has to send military aid to Israel in the illegal assault on Iran, so it very clearly does do somehing to impede the assault on Iran. And a reduction in military aid to Israel is a step in the direction of ending the genocide, so that's a nice extra. Although I'm not sure why we're talking about the genocide. Even though it's related, clearly a restricted air space to impede the illegal assault on Iran is more directly related to the assault on Iran than it is to the genocide.
Oh I have plenty of examples of right decision for the wrong reason.
We can start with Nazi Germany helping Finland defend their country against the Soviets.
Very good decision. Terrible reason as they couldn't care less about Finland, they just wanted to kill Russians and ensure they had supply lines north to send jews back to their death.
Then they also did a whole lot of other terrible things for terrible reasons. So, you asked.
I absolutely have an answer to what the "wrong reason" is. Nothing but populism. It's far easier to hide unpopular policies among one big popular one.
The statement was made that their action puts a stop or halt to their genocide of Iran. To which I answered "except it's not". It's but a short delay.
Again. I agree with the decision. But I don't think Spain deserves any praise for going hard when they've done almost nothing to help Europe since they joined the EU. It's been almost 40 years now. It was time for them to get serious 10 years ago.
Let's make it relative. Which countries are going harder against the US (without supporting Iran).
Why would it be relative? I'm sure Denmark could close their airspace to the US too, but it's not relevant so does it matter?
Other countries are busy spending enormous sums of money and resources on helping Ukraine. Opening up a second front in a second war has never been a successful strategy.
Spain's hardness isn't going enough for you. I'm highlighting that there are not many countries "going harder" than Spain (with respect to Iran).