this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
36 points (97.4% liked)

Neovim

2802 readers
18 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
erlingur@programming.dev
howarddo@programming.dev
lung@lemmy.world
36
nvim-treesitter Was Archived. Here's What You Actually Need to Do. (samuellawrentz.com)
submitted 2 days ago by codeinabox@programming.dev to c/neovim@programming.dev
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What happened?

edit: never mind, i should learn to read the fucking article hah

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Had the same question, until I've read your comment

For everyone else with the same thought:

Quick context: Neovim 0.12 (released March 29) ships built-in treesitter support, a native plugin manager, and native LSP completion. The nvim-treesitter maintainer had been rewriting the plugin to require 0.12 - and documented this clearly. Users kept demanding backward compat with 0.11. Maintainer burned out and archived it. The Hacker News thread sided overwhelmingly with the maintainer. Hard to disagree.

[–] soc@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

The Hacker News thread sided overwhelmingly with the maintainer. Hard to disagree.

Not sure I'd buy that line of thought.