this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
583 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

73287 readers
3725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cambridge study says carbon offsets are not nearly as effective as they claim to be.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MisterChief@lemmy.world 89 points 2 years ago (13 children)

All I've seen since carbon offsets became a thing is how a lot of the projects were either ineffective or outright scams. The idea itself doesn't incentivise the large carbon producers to actually reduce their emissions, but simply pay to say they are carbon neutral so they can slap it on their website for some positive pr.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Even if they worked, it's like someone breaking your arm and then paying the hospital bill and calling it a day.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

No, it's nothing like that. Nature doesn't care if a given gram of co2 was recently released or not. It only cares about the sum total. If the carbon capture schemes actually did grab a gram for every gram released, and then keep it stored for at least a century,, that'd work fine.

It's just that they almost certainly don't. They're way too cheap for the best capture systems we have, and they're not necessarily sequestering that carbon to keep it out of the atmosphere for more than a few years.

We are almost certainly going to need actual carbon sequestration. We're too close to emitting too much already.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

All the IPCC models assume massive amounts of sequestration, I believe

It's a necessity at this point, even if all fossil fuel use stops globally tomorrow

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)