Bring back per mission time colour schemes, like the pink Spitfires for dawn/dusk missions in WW2.
jmcs
Rejecting cookies without asking every time requires a cookie and that is clearly legitimate interest. The problem with legitimate interest is that it's not well defined enough and then you have companies claiming that Adsense personalization is an absolute necessity for their website.
That's a big leap considering the article mentions this is about his position on an ongoing ethnic cleansing and not about his religious views - though I suspect his religious views are colouring how he views the acceptability of crimes against humanity when targeting some groups.
I have very little sympathy for religion in public spaces but I've even less for pro-genocide people.
When you are talking about diplomats, very little.
If you put internal consistency above fun then what's the point?
You don't buy an iPhone, you pay a tithe to remain in the cult.
Would accepting a pardon expose them to civil law suits?
Poor dude, he's illiterate and doesn't even have a radio or TV.
Taxis? You know, the regulated alternative that's not in the process of doing a bait and switch by selling services at a loss until competition dies and then increase the prices.
That's were the ambiguity comes into play. The laws related to cookies want to allow things like cookies for fraud prevention and antibot protection, the problem starts when the business people say the personalised ad revenue makes it legitimate and the developers and product managers decide that having a bazillion trackers making their job a little easier makes it absolutely essential.