this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
194 points (91.1% liked)

Facepalm

3617 readers
237 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] f314@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Ooof. The house itself isn’t so bad, if a little out of place, but the lawn/paver desert they placed in front of it is absolutely horrendous!

The “makeover” of the house on the left is also pretty awful.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

If they had brought the house forward a bit they could have a normal size front area, and a bit of back garden which is more useful. Could even have divided up the land a bit better to leave some space around the house on the left. I guess it was done this way so as not to block the view of the house on the left, but the whole thing just seems like bad planning and bad taste.

It looks like it went from a warm, shared neighborhood to mismatched, isolated islands.

The saddest part to me is the loss of the matching fence style and what appears to be a shared gate to access the sidewalk. The neighborhood I grew up in had a lot of connected yards like that, and it was really nice.

[–] RougeEric@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

This.

When studying architecture, one of the things I discovered is how well modern buildings can fit together with pretty much any older style... but it has to be done with a little bit of finesse. The lack of a gate and ugly lawn here are pretty bad.

The house on the left though... That's a crime against good taste.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

House on the left? You mean the small blue barn?