this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
169 points (98.8% liked)

History Memes

2426 readers
768 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Whatever the reason, it was a famine, a wide spread scarcity of food.

Look the definition up.

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 1 points 12 minutes ago

You can call a genocide a depopulation, which is true, but omits important context.

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I mean it was a famine but only because of an overreliance on one specific crop, due to sociopolitical reasons

Normally if one crop fails due to a disease, it won't result in a full-scale famine. Most historical famines are caused by wider climate and weather patterns

So to call it a famine is a little disingenuous, even if its technically accurate

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 minutes ago

Yeah that's fair. Perhaps my objection is really that the word 'famine' spanning both environmental and man-made food shortages can blur the issue generally.

Like, aside from a few relatively brief famines exacerbated by war, the Irish Famine is pretty much the first 'artifical' famine historically. It's not until the 20th Century that these become common

So you're right, but the term 'famine' definitely gets used to imply something natural and unavoidable, particularly in the 19th Century