this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
694 points (99.2% liked)
memes
22564 readers
2538 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It’s beast-iality, definitely, but he’s an intelligent adult and can clearly communicate his desires, so it’s closer to xenophilia (meaning actual extraterrestrials, not just humans from other cultures)
Yep. Scooby and Velma totally kosher for the same reason
Theoretically, sure, but that’s pretty fucked up to do to shaggy
Velma is canonically a lesbian in several versions and Shaggy is unironically capable of getting with many women. Seriously Shaggy the chick magnet is canon.
It’s shaggy and scooby…
Velma and Daphne are together, but that’s an open relationship, so it’s not a problem for Daphne.
Put down the peanut butter, and step away from the dog...
Teratophilia actually.
Its anthropomorphic fetishizing of animals. That they would still fuck a dog as long at its human enough, is revolting.
If it can consent, what's the problem?
The bestiality part.
I believe bestiality is wrong, solely because animals can't consent, and for no other reason. In a hypothetical scenario where the specific animal in question can consent, you still believe bestiality is wrong, so clearly you have another reason. Why? What is that reason?
And you better not say "because it's disgusting"
Eek.
Oh what's that? Because you personally find it disgusting? How'd I know you were gonna say that?
Well I've got news for you about your personal opinions and the ethics of insisting that other people conform to them.
A lot of kink is disgusting to most people. That doesn't make it unethical. If someone likes getting peed on, or tasered, or verbally degraded because of their race (all things I've met people who are turned on by!), and they have a way to communicate to the person doing those things to them that they're not having fun anymore and want it to stop, and that person actually does stop, and does so immediately, there's no harm done.
No furry, no matter how depraved (and fewer furries than you'd think are horny for animal characters at all, much less quadrupedal ones), will ever actually fuck a dog, because real animals cannot consent and we know that. Furries who do actually fuck dogs get disavowed by the entire rest of the fandom almost immediately (see Hypnotist Sappho). This scenario is therefore entirely hypothetical, and if it's still morally wrong to you and you don't have an answer as to why, I think you have some work to do regarding prejudice.
Is this personal for you? Do you want to fuck a consenting dog?
What if I do? Would that make me a disgusting creep? Would that make my argument invalid?