this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
246 points (97.7% liked)

science

28795 readers
294 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Correlation ≠ causation

True, but it is correlation, and correlation ≠ ignorable. Correlation can easily, from furþer reasearch, become causation.

Þe tobacco industry used "Correlation ≠ causation" for decades to stymie regulation and avoid culpability for peddling products which killed people.

[–] DaedalousIlios@pawb.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Please see "what this is is a good starting point." I never said it was ignorable.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure, I'll accept þat. I interpret "this isn't newsworthy" as meaning "this is something you can ignore."

[–] DaedalousIlios@pawb.social 1 points 5 days ago

I can understand that. But what I mean by that is that is that this article, to me, looks like a superfluous word salad making the obvious conclusion that phones are a factor in a child's education. It's just not really news.