this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
653 points (98.4% liked)

Linux

14906 readers
260 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The point isn't so much the quality of the code itself.

The point is that AI is an inefficient power-wasting piece of trash, and the data centres that power it have significant negative impacts on people and the environment, all for the sake of devs being lazy idiots. And you'd have to be an idiot to let AI take away your skills.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 48 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The point is also that this is the pre-enshittification version of AI, and any person or system foolish enough to become dependent on it will get exploited to the best of AI companies' abilities.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

If only there were some community of people who valued using free and open source software so we had options that were not dependent on the whims of companies. Then we could have software that we could depend on that isn't dependent on the whims of corporations.

Throwing out AI because there are AI companies who causing harm is like giving up on Operating Systems because of the plethora of bad acts made by Microsoft.

I agree that everyone should avoid using OpenAI, Anthropic or any of the other companies which were created to spend trillions of dollars buying up all computer hardware on the planet while building fossil fueled datacenters.

That isn't the same as thinking that the actual machine learning technology itself is somehow inherently bad. There are many open weight models and FOSS projects that lets people use AI without contributing to the capitalist orgy that's causing all of the secondary harms.

People conflating AI technology and AI companies are failing to diagnose the issue that we're facing.

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Open weight != open source.

You can can inspect open source software. You can compile the source into binary. You cannot inspect open binary. Well, you can, but it's difficult. Can anyone ever inspect the fucking weights in a useful way? They are just bias numbers.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And all those AI models where made by requiring these companies and their data centers and their millions of dollars.

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 0 points 5 days ago

And all the cars were made requiring companies with their factories and their millions of dollars. And all the computers. And all the... Everything! WTF is your point?

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 1 points 5 days ago

Exactly! Well said. So many idiots here who think that AI=data center.

[–] halezinflames@lemmus.org 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

pre-enshittification?

Then what the hell are the models Windows is relying on if this is the GOOD stuff?

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

the opposite of "enshittified" isn't "good." some stuff sucks for fresh, new reasons before it enshittifies and turns to full on exploitative rent-seeking.

for example, anthropic quietly pulled claude code from their pro subscriptions and made it a separate subscription. that's enshittification. and stupid AI bros are gonna fall for it every time.

[–] halezinflames@lemmus.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh so it just goes from bad to worse? I see then

Usually in the context of profit milking by shareholders influencing that decline.

[–] fruitcantfly@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

When did Anthropic make Claude Code a separate subscription? I ask because it is still listed as part of the Pro subscription tier on their website. And because I haven't seen the shit-storm that would no doubt ensue if they did that

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The point isn't so much the speed and comfort of the commute itself.

The point is that a car is an inefficient power-wasting piece of trash, and the oil rigs that power it have significant negative impacts on people and the environment, all for the sake of commuters being lazy idiots. And you'd have to be an idiot to let a car take away your mobility.

[–] WormFood@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

This but unironically

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Upvoted with the hope that you're not trying to be ironic

[–] Epp@lemmus.org 0 points 5 days ago

We should all live in caves again, and wipe our butts with a handful of dry leaves.

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago

I require a tone indicator.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 0 points 5 days ago