this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
130 points (94.5% liked)

Opensource

6670 readers
199 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

AuroraStore is working fine on my lineageOS phone

[–] gankouskhan@bookwyr.me 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The article didn't even mention graphene. The user has a fairphone. It's also only impacting anon users it seems. So just like its working for you it does on graphene too. It does not work for anyone if they are using an anon account (according to the link). Not even sure why they said graphene.

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anon account? I never signed into aurora so I'd assume mines anon as well?

[–] gankouskhan@bookwyr.me 1 points 3 days ago

It's just what the article said. I do not use Google play services or its alternative implementations. There is nothing blocking graphene anymore than any other ROM on this specific issue. If anything graphene is one or the only roms that has an option to use the sandbox Google play.

tl;dr my original response was made for one reason, to respond to your statement with what the article said and some flavor text around that. The title to this thread was not only misleading, but a full on red herring. The OP the article did not even say graphene once.