Writing

1395 readers

2 users here now

Discuss writing, post craft resources, ask for feedback, etc!

No misconduct, including: harassment, abuse, assault, bullying, illegal activity, or discrimination.

Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

ElizabethEarle@sh.itjust.works

What would be the best way to demonstrate no AI has been used in your writing or creative process? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 days ago by FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world to c/writing@sh.itjust.works

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was thinking that publishing some of the handwritten notes (or as many of them as possible) might help. For me, that would be enough evidence to indicate that a writer wasn't lazy and came up with these ideas on their own - assuming the writing itself doesn't have any obvious AI tropes in.

But I feel like there are other ways, and I'm curious what ideas everyone else has

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In case you were facing a hate storm and someone started insinuating your work was just LLM writing.

If you're really worried about being accused of using AI, and you won't be able to handle it if it happens, then don't publish anything, because it is definitely going to happen. Too many people are convinced they have some perfect litmus test, and they're wrong, but they don't know it.

But really, I think you can handle it. You know you didn't use AI, and at the end of the day are you writing for yourself or for an imagined audience?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Random people making wrong accusations doesn't really constitute a "hatestorm", does it?

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago

That seems like a personal definition, and a pointless thing to nitpick over, because you're not going to find it in Merriam-Webster.