this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
59 points (90.4% liked)

GenZedong

8 readers
1 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

Serious posts can be posted here and/or in /c/GenZhou.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Not reading that (assuming) Nazi dogshit.

Let me guess: Workers have no moral right to strike because they see "stealing" value and specifically surplus value aka profits from their magnanimous capital-owning bosses?

Pathetic argument to justify exploitation and (actual) theft. Sad. Baby brained.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Not reading that (assuming) Nazi dogshit.

Gist of the "argument" is morally blackmailing workers from the pure libertarian position and suggesting those unwashed masses would all turn perfect randroids if only weren't so woefully uneducated. No kidding it's "blocking the job" when striking from someone who would want it, thus violating the sacred competition. So the strikers should just quit instead if they don't like it (it's also super old argument but was laughed away like century ago).

Holy shit how the author can be so smug while being absolute doormat for the worst that porky has to offer is beyond me.

[–] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Smugness is their state of being. All they want is that feeling of superior smugness. It's why they never attempt to hear any argument against their position and lash out at anyone that does. All their arguments are ones made in the shower from fake conversations against adversaries they imagine up, because they are otherwise incapable of arguing against someone with actual theory and understanding on their side.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)