Fediverse has emerged as the popular choice when people look for Twitter alternatives. Personally I found Mastodon was like the early days of Twitter, without half as much toxicity.

However, Fediverse comprises various instances operated by different people. Users sometimes need to switch between different instances, which can be annoying and challenging to manage effectively. I also feel it lacks the social media vibe.

Similarly, decentralisation, as seen in peer-to-peer networks, also emphasizes privacy and freedom of expression.

While exploring decentralised networks such as Nostr, Scuttlebutt, and WireMin, I found that Nostr has the highest level of recognition, whereas Scuttlebutt and WireMin have relatively small user bases currently. I believe their true value will only surface when they get big in the future. But the question is: will they indeed get big? Will decentralisation actually work?

Will Fediverse be the one to trigger the revolution and replace Twitter or Decentralisation?

What are your thoughts on this matter?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iso@lemy.lol 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Its not exactly decentralized. Yes its splitted across several servers, but these servers still centralizes the users/data. In order for us to truly say decentralized, each user must keep their own data and no other authority should be able to interfere with this user's data.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's easily supported by the fediverse if a user wants it, by just running their own instance. It's just more convenient for most users, as a result of not everyone being a technical user, to not do so and use someone else's instance.

[–] blue_berry@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I think the point of Nostr is that its that dezentralized by default, for which I think: why force that much dezentralization on to everybody? What's the merit?

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I mean it is decentralised, there is no single central point controlling the fediverse, that's decentralised by definition. Yeah isn't not decentralised to the point of being fully p2p, with everyone hosting their own data, but that's just a different kind of/approach to decentralisation which has its pros and cons. Decentralised groups cooperating is still very much decentralisation by definition.

No one has to interfere with your data if you host your own instance after all, that's always an option.

[–] blue_berry@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

That's a very narrow defintion of decentralization. Nostr is more dezentralized than the fediverse sure. But its not like going full-steam dezentralization will necessarily result in the best service. For example content moderation would be pretty difficult then I imagine.

[–] tioute@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I would agree