Games

38883 readers

955 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

Video games

Generic

Gaming: Our sister community, focused on POC and console gaming. Meme are allowed.
Cozy games: Because not everything has to explode to make a good game
Photo Mode@feddit.uk

Help and suggestions

TipOfMyJoystick@retrolemmy.com : You are searching for a game, but can't remember the name? Someone will find it for you here.
Video Game Suggestions@lemmy.zip : Can't find a game to play in among the hundred you already own? Find another one to add to your library here.
Patient Gamers@sh.itjust.works: Gaming isn't only about having the latest great games. Good old games are there too.

Platform specific

Linux gaming : For everything related to gaming on Linux platform, be it on Steam Deck or Desktop Linux.
Steam Deck : A Steam Deck specific community

Game specific

Language specific

French (jlai.lu)

Others

PM a mod to add your own

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Dremor@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Dremor@jlai.lu

modfxomt@lemmy.world

292

Unity issue an apology on Twitter for "confusion and angst" over the runtime fee policy. (nitter.net)

submitted 2 years ago by helloharu@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We have heard you. We apologize for the confusion and angst the runtime fee policy we announced on Tuesday caused. We are listening, talking to our team members, community, customers, and partners, and will be making changes to the policy. We will share an update in a couple of days. Thank you for your honest and critical feedback.

Direct Twitter link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cjsolx@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Brain dead is such an understatement too. They lost everyone's trust, and I'm not sure there's anything they can say to regain it. They're gonna try something like this again at some point, and I don't think anyone should give them the opportunity. They deserve to go under.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trust is hard to build and easy to break and even harder to rebuild.

To truly rebuild trust, they'd need to commit to never doing this again. That would mean 1. a change to the legal TOS that a developer who licenses for a project at a certain pricing level may remain at that price level for that project / that generation of Unity for as long as they wish, 2. a public commitment to never require per-install pricing, and ideally 3. the resignation of whoever came up with this brain dead idea.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Indeed, only a legal guarantee would satisfy me. Put it in writing in all the contracts that unity is not allowed to charge per install and then we can talk