this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2023
6 points (87.5% liked)
GenZedong
8 readers
1 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
Serious posts can be posted here and/or in /c/GenZhou.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information.
Rules:
- This community is explicitly pro-AES (China, Cuba, the DPRK, Laos and Vietnam)
- No ableism, racism, misogyny, transphobia, etc.
- No pro-imperialists, liberals or electoralists
- No dogmatism/idealism (Trotskyism, Gonzaloism, Hoxhaism, anarchism, etc.)
- Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I suppose the most important question is whether the proletariat can actually use this split in capitalist interests to their advantage or if class solidarity between capitalists will win out and create a compromise.
I think what's likely to happen is that a rift among the ruling class will be created: financial (primarily) and industrial capitalists that benefit from and support the policy of aggression and containment, such as the military-industrial complex, mining industry, oil industry, and finance and real estate; on the other hand, another group of financial and industrial (primarily) capitalists, such as the semiconductor industry, automobile (especially electric) industry, and other tech-based firms, will continue to push back against the hyperaggressive policy of the deep state, and pursue a mutually beneficial cooperation with Chinese firms.
I don't think that the proletariat and other laboring classes will be revolutionary until financial capitalism is supplanted by industrial capitalism - again - as the dominant mode of production.