this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
535 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

71537 readers
4067 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 110 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Worth pointing out this isn't any proper Android TV devices, but rather those cheap boxes that are often basically SBCs with AOSP installed on them which are predominantly sold as easy piracy boxes.

Edit: in fact, the article doesn't currently have TV in the title

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Leaving out the TV makes it less precise and more clickbaity because then it sounds like Android phones are affected.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess the problem is that "Android TV" is a specific thing that none of these devices actually are, they're just dodgy boxes running Android that can be plugged into a TV.

For me it's more clickbaity because Android TV isn't actually involved here at all.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd say it would be more clickbaity if you just removed the "TV", because it'd make you think of smartphones, and those would be much more concerning

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah I'm not sure what the correct headline is, but at least for me I definitely clicked because I thought it was to do with Android TV, which it wasn't. It was about those cheap boxes that anyone reading Ars already knows are probably filled with malware

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why not just find a different website reporting the story with a better headline? Rather than sharing the one with the headline you fear is misleading?

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

It's only slightly misleading and Arstechnica writes really good articles. It's pretty much the only news site I regularly browse.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 2 years ago

Is there a better article to find?

[–] Zanz@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can you even get an actual Android TV device now that isn't a Chromecast or an Nvidia shield? Other than a few TVs that mostly come with malware (tcl, Sony, Hisense) I can't think of anything else that has actual Android TV you can buy as a consumer.

[–] SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Xiaomi makes one, also Walmart carries one called Onn.