this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
9 points (76.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43810 readers
1 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen multiple requests for nsfw lemmy communities like reddit has. I live in Germany, and I think you are required to verify that the users that see porn content are above the age of 18. Does Lemmy has or plan to have a feature for that? Maybe this should be an issue on github?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BentiGorlich@feddit.de -2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Nope I meant real verification. Pornhub doesn't require it, because the server and the company are not stated in Germany. Imo all porn site should have real verification instead of the "I am 18 or older" popup, that literally does nothing to prevemt minors from seeing porn.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wtf I don't want my personal ID in a database

[–] sillypuddy@mander.xyz 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is what I see when I access pornhub from my home in Louisiana without a VPN.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What the actual fuck. It's just people having sex, for gods sake.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

I would've just blocked Louisiana instead of taking responsibility and liability for a bunch of sensitive personal information.

[–] animist@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One solution that could work in the future is that the personal device (computer or smartphone) could have the basic info that the owner is over 18 and therefore only give a "yes they are over 18" confirmation to the website without sharing any personal info.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How would you do that without giving someone both your personal info as well as the option to track what you're doing

[–] animist@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

No idea I'm not a programmer

[–] BentiGorlich@feddit.de -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That is not necessary for age verification. You just have to go through a working verification process and then you just get the checkmark in the database. most sites that really verify your age use credit cards for that, which are of course sub par, because children can just take the cards from their parents, but it is better than nothing

[–] duringoverflow@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

using your credit/debit card to verify your account is something that I also wouldn't like to do. Same as using my ID

[–] BentiGorlich@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And this process does not necessarily have to use ypu personal ID

[–] agarorn@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Never heard of something like that. Do you have an example of a website which dies that?

[–] RoaringSilence@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I can verify myself using my Id card and a terminal or via NFC. The app used is the middleware between software or website requesting verification and my ID. No data leaves my ID in direction to the software or website. The middleware just gives a thumbs up to the verification request.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Negative_Pair_5694@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The thing is, the "software" actually is open source, so you can tell how data is requested from your smart ID. The german government ID has an explicit function for age verification that does not provide any personal information.
https://github.com/Governikus/AusweisApp2

However it is probably hard and costly to get certified to use any of those functions as a service provider.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] BentiGorlich@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Something like this is exactly what I meant

[–] BentiGorlich@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No sadly I don't. I guess for most plattforms its just so much easier to not host the server in Germany/EU...

[–] agarorn@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

If you do not know any website that does this, how do you know it is required in Germany? I have never heard of that

[–] vmaziman@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

nanny state regulations shouldn’t be a replacement for simply expecting parents to do their job and ensure their kid doesn’t have unfiltered internet access

[–] BentiGorlich@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I dont know about that one. Following this logic why is it forbidden to sell alcohol and tabacco to minors or why are so many drugs illegal like everywhere, when good parenting prevents the use of these by minors? Of course this comparision is far fetched, but I dont think that the problem is solved by just filtering the internet access of minors.

[–] vmaziman@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Alcohol and drug use can lead to impaired actions when driving or otherwise contribute to causing people to harm other people. Same with tobacco and secondhand smoke. If the behavior of an individual drastically increases the likelihood that they will cause harm to others then I see the argument for government prohibition from minors. But I have yet to see a case where someone kills another due to the accused’s individual porn usage If there is sufficient empirical evidence that widespread porn usage is accessible by minors, is used by minors, and has shown a correlation to actual harm determined via experimental or observational meta study on existing cases, then I will be for id backed prohibition of pornography

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

I guess thats a problem specifically for nsfw instances in Germany then.

[–] Zetaphor@zemmy.cc 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lemmy is a platform managed by a disparate group of operators all with different levels of experience and commitment.

Verifying identity online is both a hard problem and a legal/security nightmare. It involves validating and possibly storing things like government identification or other sensitive personally identifiable information.

There is no way this will ever be implemented in the core platform. All existing solutions today are outsourced to third party companies with the expertise in validating different forms of identification as well as the legal insurance required to warehouse it.

And all of this is setting aside the obvious fact that you should not be required to doxx yourself in order to view pornographic content online. Minors will just go somewhere else outside of the jurisdiction of these rules and still get access. Hell, just turn off safe search on Bing and you can find porn.

Measures like this don't actually stop minors from accessing pornography. They only put law abiding citizens at risk by forcing them to trust private companies with their identification and hope their government doesn't decide to further police their morality, or use their revealed sexual preference against them.