this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
463 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

70395 readers
3673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
463
YouTube's plan backfires, people are installing better ad blockers (www.androidauthority.com)
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

YouTube's plan backfires, people are installing better ad blockers::People are installing and uninstalling ad blockers in record high numbers as a result of YouTube's anti-ad blocking efforts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 131 points 2 years ago (17 children)

I used to use AdBlock Plus. I like it specifically because of the Acceptable Ads policy where it allows through ads that are unobtrusive. Because I believe in supporting sites that want to fund themselves, as long as they do it in a way that isn't obnoxious.

But unfortunately ABP hasn't gotten around YouTube's new adblock-wall. So I've switched to uBlock Origin in the meantime. Which unfortunately doesn't do acceptable ads. So well done Google, you've now forced me into a position where I'm blocking more ads than I was before. Very smart.

[–] applecore@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Don’t you have to click an ad to actually support a website like that? Did you ever click? I wouldn’t, but maybe they pay for impressions as well

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In theory an ad blocker could retrieve the ads in the background and simply not display them.. I'm not sure any actually do currently, but if advertisers are silly enough to pay simply through network traffic it's an option.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There's a Firefox addon that clicks all of the ads in the background in an attempt to pollute the info pool on what you actually want and also to cost people the click on their ad campaign

[–] Ch0wW@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's perfectly evil in a way! Mind if I ask you what is the extension's name?

[–] Mezzy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

adnauseam.io

[–] Augustiner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Can anyone please link it? Seems wild, but interesting…

[–] spiderman@ani.social 1 points 2 years ago

idm that until it clicks some scam ad

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)