this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
917 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

34832 readers
1 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Solar now being the cheapest energy source made its rounds on Lemmy some weeks ago, if I remember correctly. I just found this graphic and felt it was worth sharing independently.

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is AN answer, but also not the only answer. Generating and moving power around is extremely complex and just seeing "Solar cheaper per Watt" and defining it as the best in all cases is silly. If you changed the axis to be size per MWh, then you would draw a totally different conclusion.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It was the answer. Now solar is so cheap that spamming panels and investing into ways to save the excess energy seems cheaper. By the time nuclear plants are done you're going to be at least 8 years into the future. Solar panels however are directly implementable. And even cheaper now.

[–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Solar still doesn't work at all night, no matter how cheap it gets.

It's not very useful for most of Northern Europe and birth America during the winter months. Even if it was free you'd still need alternatives.

[–] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Renewables. Not solar.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

8 years is a drop in the bucket when it comes to long term production.