this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1472 points (98.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32410 readers
1 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not with that attitude. There is no reason we can't cultivate alternatives like PeerTube. No video platform starts with a massive library and if we actually want to take back our digital rights then we have to put our foot down and give a hard "no" to trading those rights away just because we really want to watch a particular creator on a corporate platform. It's the only way to not only stick it to Google but also let creators know that viewers will not tolerate the likes of Google.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I think the hosting is the real problem. For something like Lemmy where it's just text it's not too expensive, but when you need to store and stream videos for free I have to imagine most people wouldn't be able to afford that without charging for it and the moment you start charging you can't compete with YouTube anymore

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

i think the solution could be a FOSS torrenting site where everyone hosts their own videos (or maybe a stream only site?). people are already willing to fork over for netflix so maybe if the content quality was extremely high theyd shift (e.g. nebula)

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep, this is already a solved problem via torrents. All that's needed is a site (like lemmy or something else) to host the links, and help with content discovery.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

dessalines can you make a poetry community on lemmy.ml

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

oh what weird i thought i had looked it up, thank you!

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !poetry@lemmy.ml

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 5 points 2 years ago

Nebula could be a good case study in how well this would work. The content on there is of exceptional quality. To be honest, though, that's not always what I'm looking for. Sometimes I just want a bunch of garbage rather than a little high quality content. The big social media platforms put a bunch of it in one place. I know it's not really a good thing, but sometimes I just need background noise while I do other shit and random YouTube videos really does it for me.

I can't seem to find any data on how much of Nebula's revenue is actually due to the Curiosity stream tie-in, but I know even I was wary of the $5/mo subscription without the CuriosityStream sub to sweeten the deal. So maybe even the world's largest creator-owned streaming platform needed that investment.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We need to crowdfund a starting base, and after that the site wouid have to charge something just be reasonable to not like asshole youtube.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Majority of people will always choose free, convenient and what they're used to

If it's not free it stands very little chance against something that is all 3

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I'll let you know when anyone I watch even considers giving peertube a moment of consideration.