10
NASA May Pay $1 Billion to Destroy the International Space Station. Here’s Why.
(www.scientificamerican.com)
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
10 points (91.7% liked)
Futurology
2627 readers
233 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's a shame they can't move it to a higher orbit & leave it there for future generations. People a century or two from now will be curious about the earliest days of humans in space.
It would fall down eventually and may hit some city or populated area, there is a option to shoot it to the moon but that's super expensive and needs lots of engineering.
Depends how far they boost it up. Once it's in MEO instead of LEO decay is less of a problem, and there would be ample time to achieve further boosts. For example the GPS satellites will take millenia to move considerably closer to earth.
The article actually mentions the idea, but apparently it's bound to physically fall apart after a while, and it's a big thing that could make a lot of debris. I guess you could put it in a net, but I'm not sure how cool a bundle of scrap that used to be the ISS is. The smart folks at NASA seem sure there's no point.
Yeah the ISS gets hit by space debris form time to time and they need to do very frequent maintenance to not let it fall apart