this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Chicago Bears
2 readers
1 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'd go 4, large gap, then 3, 2, 1. 3 is contingent on the defense looking extremely professional the rest of the way and no more big coaching blunders. Eberflus is on thin ice but if the team looks solid outside of shaky passing game production I could humor it.
I don't see any compelling reason for Fields to stay -- I don't want to run it back with this same exact setup again, and I don't see a reason to give him a third coaching staff. It's not viable.
3 is literally the worst option if we are talking about full on staff retention. Getsy is just dogshit, we would be better off with no OC, no play caller. If we are keeping Flus and just trashing the rest, it’s still a bad option.