this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
379 points (98.7% liked)

News

35867 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Banning marijuana growing at home, increasing the substance’s tax rate and altering how those taxes get distributed are among vast changes Ohio Senate Republicans proposed Monday to a marijuana legalization measure approved by voters last month.

The changes emerged suddenly in committee just days before the new law is set to take effect, though their fate in the full Senate and the GOP-led House is still unclear.

The ballot measure, dubbed Issue 2, passed on the Nov. 7 election with 57 percent of the vote and it set to become law this Thursday, making Ohio the 24th state to legalize marijuana for adult recreational use. But as a citizen-initiated statute, the Legislature is free to make tweaks on it, of which they’re attempting plenty.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh look! The goalposts have moved!

Can you name any Republican expansion of access to healthcare in the US? Ever?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Wait, you complained about me being focused on healthcare, but you still want to talk about it?

Well. "Obamacare" ended up being a more conservative version of Mitt Romeny's plan.

But if we're only giving credit for what's done (and I agree with that) then suddenly all the things that make neoliberals better than Republicans disappears.

I mean, the only recent expansion of healthcare by either party was when Dems passed the more conservative version of Romney's plan

You're making my point, the letter by someone's name doesn't mean much when majorities of politicians from both parties oppose progresss

There's just some with a D by their name that try, but progressives are still a minority in their own party unfortunately

Edit:

Actually with a profile blurb like that, I don't think any exchange will ever be productive...

I'm just going to use the block button, feel free to keep responding, I'll never see it.

Just don't have time for sovereign citizens who openly call for execution of politicians, even if they're terrible politicians...

I think you're doing that thing where people believe the right position is always halfway between D and R

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Do you even know what neoliberals are?

You've made it clear that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Actually with a profile blurb like that, I don’t think any exchange will ever be productive…

I'm sure you're referring to #ExecuteTrump. Which is a reference to his own penchant for calling for the execution of his political enemies, under the cover of calling it "political speech." If he can do it, so can I.