this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
1813 points (93.6% liked)

Political Memes

8754 readers
3064 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You again did not explain how anyone is silenced by downvotes. And we do not "literally see this" because you have no idea if those people who downvoted were ever going to respond.

[–] Arelin@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

how anyone is silenced by downvotes

My comment:

I don't think downvotes should be a thing at all tbh. Just silences ~~anyone~~ discussion.

.

you have no idea if those people who downvoted were ever going to respond

That's not what I said:

People have a tendency to ... dismiss any opinion ... with -1 votes or less instead of properly responding to it

People dismiss it either because it has low visibility since it's downvoted so people wouldn't see it, or because of our tendency for big numbers.

Taking out downvotes would allow for less popular opinions (that do not break rules by being hateful or spam; you'd report it in those cases) to have higher visibility and discussion since the majority can't just downvote it, just because they slightly disagree with it or are biased against it, and silence discussion.

People who do agree would also be able to show it through upvotes, and it wouldn't be eaten by the downvotes.

Thanks for your comments actually. Got me to think about the benefits more clearly. Discussions are great.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People dismiss it either because it has low visibility since it’s downvoted so people wouldn’t see it, or because of our tendency for big numbers.

That is absolutely not how Lemmy works. Downvoting has no effect whatsoever. This is not Reddit.

[–] Arelin@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That is absolutely not how Lemmy works. Downvoting has no effect whatsoever.

I assume you're talking about the 'active' and 'hot' sorting?

From the Lemmy docs:

  • Active uses the post votes, and latest comment time (limited to two days).
  • Hot uses the post votes, and the post published time.

You'd also notice this if you use Lemmy for any length of time lmao

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know what's weird? What's weird is that, despite your claim that people aren't having discussions with people who get downvoted, my reply to you was part of a huge amount of discussion with someone who was downvoted. And that is true of multiple other discussions in this post.

Is this post special? Is it the exception?

[–] Arelin@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this post special? Is it the exception?

I am the exception because I keep the less visibility thing in mind

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

That does not explain why this post contradicts your claim multiple times, but your massive ego is noted.