this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
78 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13931 readers
37 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
78
Scientist, after decades of study, concludes: We don't have free will (phys.org)
submitted 2 years ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That would be correct, the judge and jury have no more choice than the murderer, which is none. Hypothetically, the appearance of choice doesn't mean there is choice or free will. As a slightly tortured analogy, like "perfect" loaded dice, which appear that they could be anything but always give the same result.

[โ€“] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Time to make a dice which gives a specific result based on time