this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
479 points (85.3% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6847 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 295 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I really don't like that the graphs aren't across the same period of time.

[–] sharkwellington@lemmy.world 110 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I didn't notice until you pointed it out. Because why wouldn't they be??

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 55 points 2 years ago

Because there's lies, damned lies, and statistics...

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago

Presumably they are starting wherever the trend "started", although I'd like to see what it was doing before that to see if this is an unusual trend or not

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Because gaps in data are a thing? I dunno, it doesn't really seem to change the story or the outcome. Your concerns seem overblown.

[–] sharkwellington@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Then attention should be drawn to the fact that the timelines are different. The data is presented in a misleading way and we should hold ourselves to a higher standard.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Axes should remain the same with the lines missing at parts where there are missing data. This makes it clear

[–] janabuggs@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago

Omg I didn't even notice that. It's like the more you look at this the worse it gets.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm guessing the data sets they used were collected at different start times and they didn't want to truncate it