this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
262 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39391 readers
251 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] demesisx 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

In that case, the whole tech industry should, in solidarity, refuse to look for work and let the tech companies that just launched major layoffs feel the foolishness of their actions. Those tech workers need to wait long enough to allow Google, MSFT, Meta, Apple, etc. suffer the consequences of automation. If they managed this, when they finally do come crawling back, tech workers can get fat raises using this solidarity and collective action.

[–] homoludens@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pro tip: you can actually get organized in a union and strike just to get more money, no need for AI or getting fired. CEOs hate this trick!

[–] demesisx 15 points 1 year ago

tip: you can actually get organized in a union and strike just to get more money, no need for AI or getting fired. CEOs hate this trick!

✊🏼

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’d need to unionize first.

It’s expensive to live in tech communities. All the workers would need to move their families to somewhere more affordable and demand to work from home, on top of everything else, and they’d need to have enough savings to afford that. Right now, tech workers tend to carry debt, which is the bane of collective action.

[–] demesisx 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sort of. But people in society CAN act in solidarity. It's obviously unlikely (something tech CEO's calculated in these layoffs).

Obviously, capitalist exceptionalism is going to cause them not to do this. No one wants to loan their neighbor some money to weather a strike that WILL eventually lift ALL BOATS because of the whole "fuck you, got mine" vibe of EVERYONE in cutthroat capitalist societies. If I had the money, I'd certainly take part in this kind of collective action...and I'd also argue that many tech workers can because they were paid INCREDIBLY well in comparison to most trades....but you and I know they won't.

I'm a member of a stagehand union that will NEED to strike during the summer (our busiest season) in order to gain some ground back from what price gouging, austerity, and inflation has taken from us. I can easily guess how likely the membership will be to endorse a strike when we will have been out of work for more than a year when negotiations start. That doesn't make what I said less true; just about as unlikely as a third power coming to power in the United States two party electoral system.

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So long as they can pay bills during that time.

The strike did not help writers as much as it’s pretending it did

[–] demesisx 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In IATSE's case a few years ago, our (corrupt) leadership sold us on the lie that it was an "unprecedented contract" and helps all kinds of protected groups while, in reality, it was a huge pay cut when compared with inflation with inclusivisty initiatives tacked on to help them woke-wash their austerity.

There are so many things in the corporatist playbook that it's no wonder we get poorer and poorer while the studios try to starve us out of striking.

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. They wait for you to organize, because they have a million strategies to corrupt the head of the organization and make it more beneficial to themselves in the end

[–] demesisx 3 points 1 year ago

See also:

  • IATSE’s 2016 back room decision to endorse of Hillary Clinton EARLY in the primary without so much as a peep to the membership.

  • 2020’s @iastories instagram that was a firebrand radical instance of union members sharing real stories about horrific filmmaking conditions suddenly changed their tune and stopped allowing comments a week before a strike authorization would go up for a vote.