this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1270 points (95.4% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Faulty pattern recognition isn't something we should be holding on to.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is the alchemy to the chemistry is what they are saying

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

So not at all based in science? Interesting as a historical curiosity but nothing more?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And how many people are still using Alchemy?

[–] beardown@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

"I turned 5 pounds of lead into gold this morning using this one weird trick that chemists HATE! Subscribe to my premium substack to learn more!"

[–] explodicle@local106.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They told us the history of alchemy in chemistry class, it's good to know the context.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, but no one credible still uses it. Which was the point I was making.

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that we still don't have a proper pattern recognition. We could discard all the soft sciences such as Economics, Sociology or Psychology.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What hard sciences could replace economics and sociology? They're not very rigorous, but they seem to be useful. Psychology also takes some load off psychiatrists

[–] cuerdo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So is palm reading; for grifters.