this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
311 points (91.9% liked)

World News

48585 readers
1994 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Our planet becoming nearly uninhabitable or uninhabitable with millions if not billions of people dying seems like a bigger problem. But then again spreading hate about the LGBTQ+ is more important to the spokesperson for 'god'.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Climate change

Rising fascism

War and genocide

Growing inequality

Consolidation of power through AI and automation

I guess none of those things worry the Pope.

[–] abracaDavid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

But how can you sleep at night knowing that there are people living their lives in a way that doesn't affect anyone else!

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, those other problems become dramatically more difficult to manage while there is a very vocal movement attempting to nit-pick and re-write nuances of our existing social structures, like they think it's some computer program instead of the cumulative product of thousands of years of trial and error paid for in blood, sweat and tears.

[–] LemmyBe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I truly am confused about what point you’re trying to make. That we should live by the social structures from a thousand years ago? Or is it that you believe we’ve perfected the social structure and it needs no further change as of today? Or something else?

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, I absolutely believe that we need to make changes. Society is a living thing which MUST move in order to sustain itself. What I can't agree with, however, is people looking at it as though it were an inanimate object like a computer, and picking it apart as though they're writing a computer program, often without any attempts made at all to learn about the history which has led it to existing in the form which it does. I would be a lot more open to arguments from the LGBTQ movement, if the average influencer had actually studied some of the publicly available references explaining how and why we have built our societies this way. Yet instead, the movement is dominated by those who are proud to have never engaged with historical philosophical works, religious or otherwise, and that is what is truly offensive about it all.

Edit: This very same issue is actually one place in which I can't see eye to eye with a large number of religious people either today, because many don't even appear to possess the recognition of the importance of educating oneself upon the foundations of the way of life which they engage in, instead using it as a rubber stamp of approval, with as few actual qualifications as they can get away with pursuing.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is that not exactly what scientists, philosophers, artists, politicians, lawyers, psychologists, doctors and similar have been doing for thousands of years though?

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but to paraphrase Copernicus, too many want to engage in such pursuits not because they have anything to contribute, but rather because it benefits them either financially or socially, and so they only end up playing the part of drones among bees.

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know if you're aware of this but this is like the epitome of "iamverysmart" style speech. You might think that your way of speaking is so advanced that everyone else not understanding it is just dumber than you, but the reality is proper communication is about making communication as clear and concise as possible to as wide an audience as possible.

[–] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's really neat, but just because someone's use of language doesn't match your own doesn't always mean there's something wrong with them that they need to change. An important part of communication is an earnest attempt to understand the speaker, instead of just dismissing what they've expressed outright because you don't like their word choice.

Frankly I already "dumbed it down" quite considerably from the original quote, in which Copernicus expressed the reasons he was reluctant to share his research proving the Earth orbits the Sun:

Therefore I debated with myself for a long time whether to publish the volume which I wrote to prove the earth's motion or rather to follow the example of the Pythagoreans and certain others, who used to transmit philosophy's secrets only to kinsmen and friends, not in writing but by word of mouth, as is shown by Lysis' letter to Hipparchus. And they did so, it seems to me, not, as some suppose, because they were in some way jealous about their teachings, which would be spread around; on the contrary, they wanted the very beautiful thoughts attained by great men of deep devotion not to be ridiculed by those who are reluctant to exert themselves vigorously in any literary pursuit unless it is lucrative; or if they are stimulated to the nonacquisitive study of philosophy by the exhortation and example of others, yet because of their dullness of mind they play the same part among philosophers as drones among bees.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Inability to make yourself understood to those you're speaking with is a sign of low intelligence.