this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
500 points (98.6% liked)

Leftism

2452 readers
1 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dev@vlemmy.net 47 points 2 years ago (14 children)

There’s a difference between willingly handing over information and being required to by law, though, right?

I’m no Meta fan, but presumably if they were served a warrant they can’t just say no?

That’s one of the benefits of E2E encryption, where nobody but the users have the keys. The company can say no, because they simply don’t have access to see them.

[–] incognito_tuna@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Came here to say this. Without e2e encryption there’s no way for them not to. And most big companies like this are in bed with the federal government and wouldn’t really entertain that seriously.

[–] incognito_tuna@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also they want to be able to scrape/sell your chat data so they don’t want to encrypt it.

[–] ProfoundNinja@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't WhatsApp meta and encrypted?

[–] dev@vlemmy.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s been a while since I looked it up, and I don’t use WhatsApp, but I believe it’s E2E encrypted but the mechanism they use allows their servers to also hold the keys to decrypt.

Presumably they hold a master key that all other keys are derived from.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Yes. This does make it very convenient to just hop on web.whatsapp.com without also having your phone online.

WhatsApp's fine for talking to normie friends who won't ever switch to something else, for managing business clients, etc. But it's something to be aware of.

The world would be a better place if we all used Signal, XMPP, etc.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

How can we monetize the contents of people's direct messages to each other if we support encryption?

Oh. We can't. Decision made, then.

[–] mycroft@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Signal protocol for all the things.

Only, then you can't get paid for snitching... (You get to charge the government for all those requests... and you basically get to set the price.)

[–] dev@vlemmy.net 2 points 2 years ago

Right. They could implement E2E encryption, they just don’t want to - entirely plausible it’s because they don’t want to say no.

More likely it’s because they want the data :)

load more comments (9 replies)