this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
593 points (88.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7192 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaltySalamander@lemmy.fmhy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Gerrymandering makes no difference in a presidential election.

[–] thoeb@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

It does when the gerrymandering leads to policies and practices that make voting more difficult.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The clumping of whole states into winner takes all buckets, and the way that can subvert the overall popular vote, is identical to the dynamic of the “gerrymandering” proper term usually used with regard to congressional districts. To correct someone like you just did requires ignoring the entire meaning of the word to uphold to a strict definition of the word.

[–] ira@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Even with a strict definition, gerrymandering is still absolutely a thing with presidential elections, with Dakota boundaries being drawn to break it into two states to give Republicans twice as many electoral votes.

[–] DekkerNSFW@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

It's technically not gerrymandering, but the electoral college is a very similar issue.