this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
881 points (95.9% liked)

linuxmemes

26027 readers
396 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I've used arch on one machine now, am a total noob to it, and I really like it. I see what people are raving about and I see no reason to shit on it. I don't really care if 6 years ago some people were annoying about it

    [–] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Arch is good, no doubt πŸ‘.

    Void is better 😁.

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

    Faster, more stable, no systemd, supports musl and architectures not usually supported by most distros. It's probably the most stable rolling release distro out there.

    [–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What is the benefit of no systemd?

    [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It's too popular and it works too well.

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] DickFiasco@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    The main benefit is that when people get tired of distro flame wars, they can move on to init system flame wars.

    [–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    With the price of energy being what it is, people need the systemd flame wars to keep them warm!

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] zloubida@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I have no horse in this race, I don't have strong feelings about it either way as long as it works. But I can't help but notice that OP skipped replying to me.

    [–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

    OP said β€œbloated and full of bugs”.

    I've been using Arch since shortly before they started using systemd and literally never ran into a systemd bug.

    I have no clue at this point what β€œbloated” means. Maybe if everything works and you don't have to hack up your own solution all the time, that's β€œbloat”?

    [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Oh great so now i have to unlearn systemd again?

    [–] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Runit is even easier than doing things in systemd.

    https://youtu.be/PRpcqj9QR68

    It really is that easy. Runit is probably the simplest init/service manager there is out there.

    [–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

    Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

    https://piped.video/PRpcqj9QR68

    Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

    I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Does it support glibc while it supports musl?

    [–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Yes. From their website:

    C library diversity

    Void Linux supports both the musl and GNU libc implementations, patching incompatible software when necessary and working with upstream developers to improve the correctness and portability of their projects.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "Patching incompatible software"

    What does that mean? If glibc is supported why there is a portability issueand requirement of patches?

    [–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Presumably so it can work with either libc implementation.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I have checked the void website and it does NOT support glibc. Here is it:

    Wait edit: there is musl variant and glibc variant..

    Incompatible software

    musl practices very strict and minimal standard compliance. Many commonly used platform-specific extensions are not present. Because of this, it is common for software to need modification to compile and/or function properly. Void developers work to patch such software and hopefully get portability/correctness changes accepted into the upstream projects.

    Proprietary software usually supports only glibc systems, though sometimes such applications are available as flatpaks and can be run on a musl system. In particular, the proprietary NVIDIA drivers do not support musl, which should be taken into account when evaluating hardware compatibility.

    glibc chroot

    Software requiring glibc can be run in a glibc chroot.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Well if glibc is supported all glibc softwares must work right?? Patching the software to support musl would not be needed if it does support glibc

    [–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

    Even if it's supported, it doesn't mean it needs to be installed in every system. If the user wants to use a Musl-based system, the software working only on glibc needs to be patched. At least that's how I understood these statements.

    [–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

    But the Void Linux team specifically wants to support both glibc and musl

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Yes, there are basically 2 builds for every architecture. One is glibc, the other is musl. I haven't used the musl builds that much, just toyed with them a few times (mainly because of lack of software), but if you only use open source software that doesn't specifically depend on the GNU toolchain, yes, you can daily drive it, no doubt there. And yes, it is faster than the glibc builds.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Many programs aren't packaged for Void though

    load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] Titou@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

    Gonna give it a try one day

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
    [–] ByteWelder@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

    The existence of ArchWiki and the Arch User Respository (AUR). And rolling releases, if that’s your thing.

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Basically just the fact that it's very lightweight, I was able to install it on an rpi5 (not officially supported), install only what I needed, and was able to resolve all the issues I had for my niche use-case.

    There is a quite noticeable difference in how snappy it feels versus the official rpi OS. Arch runs way zippier on it. Those devices are a little limited hardware-wise so it makes a big difference in what it feels like to use that system.

    I also like knowing that the updates flowing in so quickly, I get the latest fixes and new features before I would on any of the other distros I've used. I have always been a little scared of rolling releases but over the last couple months I haven't seen any breakages yet so fingers crossed! A lot of people have tried to tell me rolling release can be solid, but I was skeptical.

    [–] bort@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    snappy it feels versus the official rpi OS

    I blame the desktop manager. Once I ditched the default von on the pi, and replaced it with standard gnome, the pi became almost as snappy as my regular notebook.

    in general: standard debian should be exactly as light-weight as arch.

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    Good to know. Yeah, I actually did try to install debian iirc but I didn't have any luck.

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Oh I misread what you wrote in the first paragraph. Yeah I actually did try that route too, installing Gnome on PI OS lite. I used this guide: https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=276512

    It actually was pretty slow for me for some reason. I had some weird crashes and things too, so I abandoned that.

    [–] bort@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

    for me it was on a pi5. maybe the amd64 was what made it work for me? idk.

    [–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's a bit tounge in cheek, nobody actually got mad at the arch namedropping. More like "I'm a platinum level player in LoL". Lol.

    [–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    I always got the impression that it was more of an "Oh god one of THESE insufferable people". I'm just saying from my experience -- they have a point. Arch is pretty nice.

    [–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

    Damn you're calling me out. It's emerald now.