this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10533 readers
41 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AccmRazr@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s also very likely that Ukraine will be using the cluster munitions to clear out minefields more than using them as an attacking/defensive weapon

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s also very likely that Ukraine will be using the cluster munitions to clear out minefields more than using them as an attacking/defensive weapon

pretty much everyone says they're going to use these for good reasons that will not harm civilians and have purely military consequences―it never works out that way, and seldom is restricted to those uses once rubber hits the road. i'm not sure why we're assuming that this will be any different other than that the actor is sympathetic and we'd like to (incorrectly) assume their judgement is unimpeachable and infallible.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The people who should weigh the risks to Ukrainian civilians are Ukrainians themselves.

Minefields pose the same sort of risk to civilians, but I think it would be inappropriate to insist the Ukrainians can't use mines to defend themselves.

[–] AccmRazr@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

It’s like everyone forgot about post vietnam stories where kids were getting blown to bits just running around being kids.

The other talking point seems to be the failure rates of the cluster munitions, but left by the wayside is the fact that they can dismantle them and use the charge within to detonate mines.