this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
56 points (96.7% liked)

[Dormant, please move to !television@lemm.ee] Movies and TV Shows

2715 readers
1 users here now

Please move to

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not at all. I'm saying that this use doesn't seem to violate any laws.

[–] Lath@kbin.earth 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that's up to the courts to decide and perhaps in this case, the company decided a verdict against them would be more damaging than a settlement.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I said, they don’t have resources (funds, time, patience, motivation, etc.) to fight it.

[–] Lath@kbin.earth 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You did. I misread at the time or not at all.

I guess it might have been a waste of time they'd rather have skipped. Same as this chain of replies might be for you.
Huh.

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago

LOL! Not at all. It’s always nice to realize at the end of the day that we agree. We just express it differently. :)