People have the right to have children, regardless of if the circumstances they'll be brought up in are up to your approval. To say they shouldn't have that right is not pro-choice, it's anti-natalist.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes and who denies them having children?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one. Irrelevant.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But you were literally pointing that out? Or would you say that your entire point is irrelevant and should be dismissed?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one is presently stopping people from having kids, but that doesn't mean that anti-natalism doesn't exist.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mhm...

Looks OP antinatalism

Yup I sure do exist. But that doesn't mean I would enforce others to not have kids.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, there you have it. Your position is wrong and awful, and I'm opposed to it and have no problem saying so. That's that.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My position is awful because I decided for myself that I don't want kids? The fuck is wrong with you Mr Moral Apostle?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's not what anti-natalism is.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Okay then I assumed wrong, my bad.